"Dadaab refugee camp located on the Kenya- Somalia border is undoubtedly the largest refugee camp worldwide, housing some 400,000 refugees. The fall of Siad Barre in 1991 led to lawlessness as different militia groups stuggled for control, thousands of Somalis fled
to Dadaab where the UNHCR built a camp whose initial capacity was 90,000."-Vollah Owino
Kenya
has not failed its refugees and needs to be appreciated for hosting immigrants
from nearby Somalia to the greater Horn of Africa for over 20 years. To the
contrary, the international community has failed and continues turning a blind
eye to the increasing refugee population in Daadab camp. I believe that the
United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) is not fully prepared to
handle the influx of refugees at the Horn of Africa into the Kenyan territorial
boundaries. For starters, Dadaab, the world’s largest refugee camp, is situated
in North Eastern Kenya.
Human Rights
Violations Under international law, States are prohibited
from forcibly returning people to a place where they would risk human
rights violations. This is known as the principle of non-refoulement.
Kenya is a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1969
Organisation of African Unity Refugee Convention.
Refugees are also
protected under the Kenya Refugee Act 2006 from forcible return to countries
where their safety is not guaranteed. On 11 April, Deputy President William Ruto
said the Government instructed the UNHCR to close Dadaab refugee camp within
three months and return refugees to Somalia or else Kenya would take the
initiative. The strong statement from the Executive prompted the question, ‘what
about non-Somali refugees? Where do they go? What considerations have been made
for this process? Refugee repatriation is not voluntary when host country
authorities deprive refugees of any real freedom of choice through outright
coercion or measures such as, for example, reducing essential services.
Refugees at Daadab Refugee Camp |
Al Shabaab
The Government of
Somalia does not have effective control over many parts of south
and central Somalia. Violence and insecurity persists and residents are
frequently subjected to indiscriminate and targeted attacks.
If refugees are
sent back, they risk human rights abuses ranging from
rape, killings and
extortion. While it is unclear who is responsible for attacks on civilians in all
circumstances, it is believed all parties to the conflict carry out such
attacks.
A lot has been
done by Kenya in efforts to secure peace for neighbouring Somali by sending the
Kenya Defence Forces (KDF) to seize territories held by Al Shabaab – a Somali terror
group. The most unfortunate flip side of this are the intermittent attacks by
Al Shabaab within Kenyan for vengeance. For instance, recent the killing of 147 college students at Garissa University on the 2nd
of April. Garissa is 100 km from the
Kenya – Somali border.
The African
Union under the umbrella of Amison also has troops patrolling and monitoring
situations in Somalia. If anything, the presence of troops is a sign of peace and
not an engagement for war. It’s time for the Somali refugees to voluntarily
move back to their country to help set up administrative structures and
channels of authority.
Refugee
Repatriation
This
is not the first time that plans to return refugees to Somalia have been
discussed. In November 2013, a tripartite agreement was signed between the Governments
of Kenya, Somalia, and UNHCR, setting out a framework for the voluntary return
of refugees to Somalia was agreed upon. The pilot phase began in December 2014.
For
refugee repatriation to be lawful, they must be genuinely voluntary without undue
pressure and with returnees’ safety and dignity guaranteed. What the Kenyan
Government faces is a slow process in the voluntary return of the refugees and
a continued attack on its citizens by Al Shabaab whose sympathisers allegedly
entail some Somali refugees in Daadab. It is difficult to distinguish between a
once innocent refugee seeking asylum and the converted Al Shabaab sympathiser
in the same camp, targeting the citizens of the host country.
Militant
Groups
Some
of the reasons given by the detained refugees is the frustrations of staying in
camps for decades with restrictions and a slow process of addressing their needs.
The needs include asylum seeking processes and a means to earn income while in
the camps to which case militant groups sway them with money to turn against
the host country.
These
are just a few examples of collective Government failures to protect refugees.
But the United Nations, United States and other Western Governments, have
further failed refugees across Africa and other parts of the world by allowing
them to be warehoused in camps for decades without basic human rights as
freedom of movement, protection from violence, and ability to support their families.
Before
Kenya is condemned in the eyes of the international community, recognition of
the difficulties it faces today have to be addressed for it’s a Government’s duty
to provide security both internally and along its territorial boundaries.
-Mr.
Migowe is a Fellow at Hesselbein Global LeadershipAcademy currently pursuing
the Advocates Training Programme at the Kenya School of Law
No comments:
Post a Comment